Home » Blog Post » Grey Literature Vs White Papers for Systematic Reviews

Grey Literature Vs White Papers for Systematic Reviews


Systematic reviews are the backbone of evidence-based research, providing a structured and comprehensive approach to synthesizing existing knowledge. In the realm of systematic reviews, two distinct types of literature—Grey Literature vs White Papers—emerge as valuable yet often overlooked sources. This article aims to explore their characteristics, assess their suitability for systematic reviews, and delve into real-world case studies that exemplify their inclusion in evidence synthesis.

I. Characteristics of Grey Literature:

Grey Literature, encompassing a range of non-traditional sources, plays a crucial role in expanding the scope of systematic reviews. From unpublished works to institutional repositories, the diversity of sources offers unique perspectives that conventional literature may miss. However, challenges such as limited indexing and varied formats pose hurdles for researchers seeking to incorporate grey literature into their reviews.

II. Characteristics of White Papers:

White Papers, formal documents crafted for specific purposes, serve as influential tools in business and policy contexts. Identifying authors, evaluating credibility, and understanding the structured content are vital aspects when considering their use in systematic reviews. A balance between technical details and accessibility is crucial for researchers navigating the landscape of white papers.

III. Grey Literature vs White Papers: Suitability for Systematic Reviews:

Examining the suitability of Grey Literature and White Papers for systematic reviews reveals their potential contributions and challenges. While grey literature offers unique perspectives and addresses research gaps, challenges arise in terms of quality and bias considerations. White papers, on the other hand, can play a significant role in policy-related research, offering industry perspectives that enrich the evidence base.

It is crucial to ensure that when selecting white papers for your systematic review, you choose those from governmental institutions and reputable organizations. This is because many companies use white papers as marketing tools, often obtained from content writing services. Consequently, not every white paper is suitable for inclusion in a systematic review. Similarly, certain forms of grey literature, such as undergraduate and master’s dissertations, require careful consideration in their approach as they may lack scientific quality needed for a rigorously conducted systematic review.

IV. Methodological Considerations:

Incorporating Grey Literature and White Papers into systematic reviews requires tailored search strategies and clear inclusion/exclusion criteria. Researchers must navigate the complexities of identifying relevant grey literature and evaluating the reliability of information presented in white papers. Methodological considerations become paramount in ensuring the integrity and rigor of the systematic review process.

V. Case Studies:

A. Incorporating Grey Literature:

    • Example 1: A systematic review on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions that included grey literature from conference proceedings, unpublished theses, and reports. The inclusion of diverse sources provided a holistic view of the topic and uncovered valuable insights not found in traditional databases.
    • Example 2: An environmental impact assessment systematic review that incorporated grey literature from government reports and non-profit organizations. The inclusion of these sources enriched the review’s understanding of the broader environmental context.

B. Incorporating White Papers:

    • Example 1: A policy-oriented systematic review on the impact of technology in education that included white papers from educational institutions and industry stakeholders. The white papers contributed nuanced perspectives on the practical implications of technology adoption in educational settings.
    • Example 2: An economic systematic review exploring the effects of a specific policy change that integrated white papers from governmental bodies. The inclusion of white papers provided insights into the policy’s intended outcomes and its real-world impact on various sectors.

C. Comparative Analysis of Findings:

    • Analyzing the findings of systematic reviews that included both grey literature and white papers highlights the complementary nature of these sources. While grey literature often provides diverse and context-specific insights, white papers offer industry-driven perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the research topic.

VI. Conclusion:

In conclusion, the inclusion of Grey Literature vs White Papers in systematic reviews adds depth and breadth to evidence synthesis. Navigating the challenges posed by these sources requires careful consideration of methodological aspects. The case studies presented underscore the practical application of incorporating both grey literature and white papers, emphasizing their unique contributions to advancing knowledge in various fields. Researchers are encouraged to embrace the richness offered by these diverse sources when conducting systematic reviews, ensuring a more nuanced and holistic approach to evidence synthesis.

Place your order
Unlock Your Exclusive Offer: Enjoy a Phenomenal 30% Off Your Very First Order! 🌟 Use Coupon Code: NEW-ME
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand services
  • Systematic Review Service
  • Meta Analysis Services
  • Literature Search Service
  • Literature Review Assistance
  • Scientific Article Writing Service
  • Manuscript Publication Assistance
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard, etc)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.